The cryptocurrency world recently celebrated Bitcoin’s 10th anniversary, but amid the festivities, a surprising development in the Ethereum ecosystem caught the attention of many: the Ethereum Foundation has made a significant overture toward Ethereum Classic (ETC), reigniting dialogue between two blockchains born from the same origin.
This gesture isn’t just symbolic—it’s backed by tangible action. In a move that signals reconciliation and collaboration, the Ethereum Foundation announced a donation of 15,000 ETC, valued at approximately $150,000 at the time of writing, to the Ethereum Classic Cooperative. While this may seem like a minor footnote in the broader crypto narrative, it carries deep historical and technical significance.
👉 Discover how blockchain collaborations are shaping the future of decentralized finance.
The Origins of the ETH and ETC Split
To understand the weight of this reconciliation attempt, we must revisit 2016—the year of The DAO hack. The DAO (Decentralized Autonomous Organization) was one of the earliest attempts at decentralized governance through smart contracts on Ethereum. However, a critical vulnerability was exploited, resulting in the theft of around 3.6 million ETH—roughly 4.2% of all ether in circulation at the time.
In response, the Ethereum community faced a pivotal decision: uphold immutability or recover stolen funds. The majority chose the latter, leading to a hard fork that rolled back the blockchain to reverse the hack. This new chain became what we now know as Ethereum (ETH).
However, a faction within the community opposed this intervention on philosophical grounds, arguing that "code is law" and blockchain history should never be altered. These purists continued operating on the original chain, which retained the name Ethereum Classic (ETC)—a permanent record of every transaction, including the DAO theft.
From that point forward, ETH and ETC evolved independently, often with tension and public skepticism between their communities.
From Rivalry to Reconciliation
For years after the split, communication between the two camps was minimal—limited to occasional debates on social media and forums. But signs of thawing began emerging in 2018, when the Ethereum Foundation invited Anthony Lusardi, a key figure in the ETC community, to speak at Edcon, a major Ethereum developer conference. The topic? How ETH and ETC could cooperate.
That moment marked the beginning of a slow but meaningful rapprochement. Since then, several collaborative efforts have laid the groundwork for renewed partnership:
- Joint funding with the Ethereum Foundation to support Akomba Labs in developing a trustless bridge between ETH and ETC, enabling interoperability.
- Technical exchanges between IOHK’s research team and Ethereum’s core researchers on consensus mechanisms, particularly around proof-of-stake innovations.
- Commitment from Mantis, IOHK’s ETC client, to align more closely with Ethereum client standards, improving cross-chain compatibility.
These developments reflect a growing recognition: despite ideological differences, both networks share a common technological DNA and face similar challenges in scalability, security, and adoption.
Why Donate Now? The Rationale Behind the 15,000 ETC Gift
The recent donation of 15,000 ETC wasn’t pulled from thin air. It came from previously held reserves in an old Ethereum Foundation wallet—funds originally acquired during the split but never sold. Rather than monetize them, the Foundation chose to repurpose these assets toward unity.
Here’s why this decision makes strategic sense:
1. Recognition of Technical Excellence
The Ethereum Classic community has produced high-quality tools that benefit the broader ecosystem. For example:
- SputnikVM, an alternative virtual machine implementation, has demonstrated performance advantages over some mainstream clients.
- It already supports the EVMC (Ethereum Virtual Machine Connector) API, used internally by Geth—the most widely adopted Ethereum client—making integration easier.
2. Innovation in Wallet Development
Projects like Emerald Wallet offer robust infrastructure for dApp development and user interaction. Ethereum developers see potential in adapting such tools for ETH-based applications, accelerating innovation across chains.
3. Support for Client Diversity
One of Ethereum’s core principles is avoiding client centralization. By supporting diverse implementations—even those rooted in ETC—the ecosystem becomes more resilient to bugs, attacks, and governance failures.
4. Healing Community Divides
Beyond technology, this gesture is about healing relationships. As the statement notes: "ETH and ETC won’t suddenly become best friends—but they’re undoubtedly the closest pair among the top 25 cryptocurrencies in terms of tech stack and vision."
In a space where competition often overshadows cooperation, this act reminds us that progress thrives not in isolation, but through shared effort.
👉 See how leading platforms are fostering innovation across blockchain networks.
Mixed Reactions: Is the Olive Branch Welcome?
Not everyone in the ETC community welcomed this move with open arms. Donald McIntyre, involved in business development at ETCDEV (a group not affiliated with the Ethereum Classic Cooperative), expressed skepticism.
He suggested that Vitalik Buterin and the Ethereum Foundation might be attempting to blur the lines between ETH and ETC, potentially confusing market perception and undermining ETC’s independent identity. To him, a $150,000 donation pales in comparison to such strategic concerns.
Still, others view this as a positive step forward—a chance to move past old grievances and focus on building useful technology together.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q: What caused the split between Ethereum and Ethereum Classic?
A: The split occurred in 2016 after The DAO hack. The Ethereum community voted to hard fork the blockchain to recover stolen funds, creating Ethereum (ETH). Those who opposed altering blockchain history continued on the original chain, now known as Ethereum Classic (ETC).
Q: Why did the Ethereum Foundation donate ETC instead of selling it?
A: The donated ETC came from old holdings. Instead of profiting from them, the Foundation chose to use these assets to promote collaboration, strengthen ties with the ETC community, and support long-term interoperability.
Q: Can ETH and ETC work together technically?
A: Yes. Efforts like cross-chain bridges and shared APIs (e.g., EVMC) make interoperability feasible. Projects like SputnikVM and Mantis demonstrate growing technical alignment.
Q: Does this mean Ethereum Classic is now part of Ethereum?
A: No. Both remain independent blockchains with separate communities, development paths, and philosophies. The donation reflects cooperation—not consolidation.
Q: Will there be more joint initiatives between ETH and ETC?
A: While no official roadmap exists, ongoing research collaborations and infrastructure projects suggest continued engagement is likely.
Q: How can users benefit from ETH-ETC cooperation?
A: Greater client diversity improves network security. Interoperable tools can reduce development costs and enable seamless asset or data transfer across chains.
A Step Toward a More Unified Blockchain Future
While ideological differences remain, actions speak louder than words. The Ethereum Foundation’s donation is more than charity—it’s an investment in ecosystem resilience, technical synergy, and community healing.
In a digital world where fragmentation is common, this gesture stands out as a rare example of mature reflection and forward-thinking collaboration.
As both communities continue evolving, one thing becomes clearer: whether through ETH or ETC, the legacy of Ethereum’s vision endures—not just in code, but in the willingness to reconcile, innovate, and grow together.