The evolution of blockchain technology continues to unfold in tandem with the regulatory frameworks of nations worldwide. As governments grapple with the dual nature of blockchain—its foundational infrastructure and its native digital assets—regulatory approaches have diverged, shaped by economic priorities, financial stability concerns, and technological readiness.
While countries like China uphold a "chain-and-coin separation" principle—encouraging blockchain innovation while tightly restricting cryptocurrency trading—many Western and Asian economies treat both components as inseparable, regulating crypto assets under existing financial laws or through new legislation. This article explores key regulatory trends across major global regions in 2020, highlighting shifts in policy focus on taxation, anti-money laundering (AML), stablecoins, central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), and licensing frameworks.
China: Promoting Blockchain Innovation, Restricting Crypto Trading
In China, government discourse emphasizes terms like blockchain, digital currency, technology, and financial application. The overarching strategy supports blockchain as a national technological breakthrough while maintaining strict control over speculative crypto activities.
Over 21 provincial governments mentioned blockchain in their 2020 work reports, signaling strong institutional backing. Central agencies—including the People’s Bank of China (PBOC), the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC), and the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC)—issued policies to guide development in areas such as:
- Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) pilots: The PBOC accelerated trials of the digital yuan in cities like Shenzhen and Suzhou, including public red packet giveaways via state-owned banks.
- Risk warnings: Financial regulators repeatedly cautioned against virtual currency speculation, reinforcing that no entity should engage in illegal crypto trading or exchange services.
- Regulatory sandboxes: Pilot zones tested blockchain applications in finance under controlled environments.
- Standards development: The Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) led efforts to establish technical and security standards for blockchain systems.
Local governments also rolled out significant incentives. For example:
- Shenzhen offered up to 3 million RMB in subsidies for blockchain firms.
- Tianjin provided 5 million RMB support for key projects.
- Hangzhou launched a 1 billion RMB venture fund dedicated to blockchain innovation.
👉 Discover how digital currency innovations are reshaping global finance today.
Judicial authorities clarified that Bitcoin is a virtual commodity with property value but lacks legal tender status. Law enforcement cracked down on crypto-related crimes, including the $4 billion PlusToken Ponzi scheme and illegal USDT-based payment platforms. Overall, China’s stance remains clear: foster blockchain technology, suppress unregulated token trading.
United States: Asset-Based Regulation with Emphasis on Compliance
U.S. regulatory language frequently features keywords such as crypto asset, regulation, securities, stablecoin, and taxation. Unlike China, U.S. agencies generally treat cryptocurrencies as property or assets, integrating them into existing legal structures.
Key developments in 2020 included:
Treasury Department: AML and Banking Integration
The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) proposed rules requiring identity verification for self-hosted wallet transfers, aligning with global AML trends. The IRS intensified scrutiny over crypto taxation, mandating taxpayers to report any virtual currency activity.
Meanwhile, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) made headlines by allowing national banks to provide cryptocurrency custody services—legitimizing institutional involvement in digital assets.
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC): Crackdown on ICOs
The SEC continued treating most Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs) as unregistered securities offerings. High-profile cases included lawsuits against Kik Interactive and Ripple Labs for conducting billion-dollar unregistered sales.
Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC): Derivatives Oversight
The CFTC classified crypto assets as commodities and focused on regulating futures markets. It issued investor alerts about volatility and fraud risks in crypto derivatives.
Federal Reserve: Cautious on Digital Dollar
While acknowledging the potential benefits of a CBDC—such as improved payment efficiency—Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell expressed caution over privacy, cybersecurity, and financial system stability, indicating no immediate plans for a digital dollar.
Asia (Excluding Mainland China): Proactive CBDC Development and Licensing
Japan, South Korea, Singapore, and Hong Kong emerged as leaders in structured crypto regulation.
Central Bank Digital Currencies
All four regions actively explored CBDCs:
- Singapore completed technical readiness assessments for a non-retail CBDC.
- South Korea advanced to phase two of its CBDC pilot project.
- Japan established a dedicated CBDC task force within the Bank of Japan.
Regulatory Licensing and AML Measures
- Hong Kong: The Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) granted the first license to OSL Digital Securities.
- South Korea: Enacted the "Special Financial Law," mandating exchanges to obtain licenses and implement strict KYC procedures.
- Singapore: Implemented the Payment Services Act, requiring all crypto firms to be licensed under categories like "Major Payment Institution."
Both Hong Kong and South Korea strengthened AML requirements, compelling service providers to report customer identities.
Blockchain Adoption Initiatives
South Korea invested heavily in blockchain talent through its "Digital New Deal." Singapore advanced the Project Ubin, testing interbank settlements using blockchain.
Europe: Legal Clarity and Stablecoin Scrutiny
European nations prioritized legal frameworks, AML compliance, and CBDC research.
Germany required licenses for crypto ATMs under its Banking Act. Russia permitted crypto trading but banned its use as legal tender. Portugal introduced a regulatory sandbox for emerging technologies.
Notably, Sweden and Lithuania led CBDC experimentation:
- Lithuania issued LBCoin, a commemorative digital currency backed by its central bank—the first of its kind in the Eurozone.
- Sweden analyzed four models for an e-krona pilot.
👉 Explore the future of decentralized finance under evolving global regulations.
A major shift was increased focus on stablecoin risks. France and Russia warned against privately issued fiat-backed stablecoins threatening monetary sovereignty. The European Central Bank pushed forward with "digital euro" preparations.
Middle East and Central Asia: Mining-Friendly Policies and Taxation Models
Countries like Iran, Kazakhstan, and Uzbekistan embraced crypto mining due to abundant energy resources.
- Iran issued licenses to 14 mining farms and reduced electricity costs during peak hours.
- Kazakhstan defined mining as a legitimate business activity and planned to double investments by year-end.
- Uzbekistan went further by exempting crypto-related income from taxation.
Several nations began introducing tax frameworks:
- Kazakhstan proposed a 15% tax on mining profits.
- Kyrgyzstan added a dedicated chapter to its tax code covering crypto mining revenues.
CBDC progress was notable:
- UAE and Saudi Arabia successfully tested a cross-border digital currency settlement system.
- Lebanon announced plans to launch a national digital currency to restore banking confidence.
International Organizations: Coordinating Global Standards
Groups like the G7, G20, FATF, IMF, and EU worked toward harmonizing regulations.
- G7 rejected Facebook’s Libra (now Diem), citing threats to financial stability.
- FATF urged global coordination on VASP regulation and information sharing.
- EU committed to establishing a comprehensive legal framework for digital assets within three years.
Stablecoins were a top concern, with calls for strict oversight to protect consumers and preserve monetary authority.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: What is the difference between CBDC and cryptocurrency?
A: A Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) is a digital form of a country's fiat money, issued and regulated by its central bank. Cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin are decentralized and not backed by any government.
Q: Are cryptocurrencies legal worldwide?
A: No. While many countries allow trading and investment, others ban or restrict them entirely. Regulatory status varies significantly by jurisdiction.
Q: How do governments regulate crypto exchanges?
A: Most require exchanges to obtain licenses, comply with KYC/AML rules, report transactions, and safeguard user funds—similar to traditional financial institutions.
Q: Why are stablecoins under regulatory scrutiny?
A: Because they can scale rapidly and potentially disrupt monetary policy if backed by large reserves without oversight—posing systemic risks.
Q: Can blockchain exist without cryptocurrency?
A: Yes. Many enterprise blockchains operate without native tokens, focusing solely on data integrity and process automation—exactly the model promoted in China.
Q: What role does FATF play in crypto regulation?
A: The Financial Action Task Force sets international standards for combating money laundering. Its "Travel Rule" requires VASPs to share sender/receiver data, influencing national regulations globally.
👉 Stay ahead with real-time insights into compliant crypto trading platforms.